2021 Ford Bronco, aka 2021 Defender 90 & 110

donb

Well-known member
They are very quickly stopping the supply of all Defender parts...

Is that a bad thing?

It seems like companies like RN (with the LHD dash parts and NAS ST cae they came out with recently) and other suppliers you could make most of a Defender with non-LR made items.
 

Red90

Well-known member
Is that a bad thing?

It seems like companies like RN (with the LHD dash parts and NAS ST cae they came out with recently) and other suppliers you could make most of a Defender with non-LR made items.

There are a lot of parts that are too complex for an aftermarket supplier to produce in low quantities. I suppose it is okay for the uber rich NAS truck owners to pay insane money for parts, but normal people that just use them as intended will struggle to keep them going at some point.
 

Tbaumer

Technical Excellence Contributor
The long production run, parts availability worldwide & simple construction were a big part of my first time LR decision. No new vehicle (available in the US) can claim that. If I were to buy new, the Bronco sure looks good though!
 

O2batsea

Well-known member
This thing is huge

This is the new way of selling stuff. Instead of a multimillion dollar product rollout, they get influencers to do a check out of a prototype and post it on their socials. Costs Ford like nothing and builds product buzz. Super skeev, but insanely effective.
 

jymmiejamz

Founding Member
Callsign: KN4JHI
This is the new way of selling stuff. Instead of a multimillion dollar product rollout, they get influencers to do a check out of a prototype and post it on their socials. Costs Ford like nothing and builds product buzz. Super skeev, but insanely effective.

How is that super skeev? Influencers make a shit load of money doing this kind of thing. A friend’s girlfriend that was an “influencer” would get paid like $1,500 just to post an Instagram photo with a product in the background. I remember one year she made around $300k. To me, the shady ones are the advertising agencies.

Getting mad at influencers replacing ad agencies is like getting made at Netflix replacing blockbuster
 

acheck

Well-known member
could not agree more @jymmiejamz

compared to LR's contrived "lifestyle" advertising, this actually has content (although I'm at odds with demuro specifically in more ways than one)

also, ford had a huge bronco launch. they blocked out like 10 or 15 minutes of simultaneous time across a bunch of major TV networks back in July to broadcast the unveiling.
 
Last edited:

LR Max

Well-known member
This is the new way of selling stuff. Instead of a multimillion dollar product rollout, they get influencers to do a check out of a prototype and post it on their socials. Costs Ford like nothing and builds product buzz. Super skeev, but insanely effective.

I wouldn't say its the "most" they use but definitely part of the marketing plan. If they have dead time in their marketing budget, they'll fill that with low cost influencer stuff. But as @acheck said, remember Ford did a huge release and has been including it in their general Ford Advertising commercials and in print ads.

Chipping an influencer $1500 is cheap compared to paying a photographer/agency $20k/day to do a multi-day shoot then buy ad space somewhere. I bet Ford spent most of their marketing budget for the initial release, then high exposure ad space (football commercials), then will spend a lot when the car hits the dealers. So filling in the middle with Supercar Blondie people is like, sure whatever. Don't dent it.
 

donb

Well-known member
There are a lot of parts that are too complex for an aftermarket supplier to produce in low quantities. I suppose it is okay for the uber rich NAS truck owners to pay insane money for parts, but normal people that just use them as intended will struggle to keep them going at some point.

Just curious (and it might be a topic for another thread) but what parts are too complex to produce in low quantities? And if that is the case you can see why Land Rover would stop producing them for business reasons.
 

RBBailey

NAS-ROW Addict
Callsign: KF7KFZ
I still can't believe Rover couldn't figure out how to keep the new Defender an actual Defender. In general, I like the new Defender, but it just misses the mark on the style and overall "toughness" factor that would have made it a bullseye in this current market. Ford has done it. Toyota has. Mercedes has. Jeep has. It just keeps boggling the mind.
 

hillstrubl

Founding Member
I still can't believe Rover couldn't figure out how to keep the new Defender an actual Defender. In general, I like the new Defender, but it just misses the mark on the style and overall "toughness" factor that would have made it a bullseye in this current market. Ford has done it. Toyota has. Mercedes has. Jeep has. It just keeps boggling the mind.
IMO it was designed like this on purpose because they intended to target a different customer than what the original defender was targeting. People like this ->
. What's sad is that its evident that this thinking resulting in them turning a blind eye to design attributes that could serve both types of customers, something the Bronco nailed.
 
Last edited:

RBBailey

NAS-ROW Addict
Callsign: KF7KFZ
I watched that video earlier today. It bugged me because OBVIOUSLY a vehicle that is essentially 30 years newer is going to do better at most normal off road situations. But nothing is said of driving technique, or of airbag issues, or electronics getting confused when the driver is taught to rely on them rather than good driving. Which of those vehicles will still be driving 30 years from now?
 
Top