What tire size is this?

rocky

NAS-ROW Addict
Here the problem. Visual trickery.
A 255/85 tire looks BIG on a 90 but right sized on a 110. I run 255 which only with wheel spacers on filled out the wheel arch width size.
Another runs the 315 and those tires stick out way beyond the wheel arches.
That’s why I’m on board with 285/75-16.
 

MountainD

Technical Excellence Contributor
Here the problem. Visual trickery.
A 255/85 tire looks BIG on a 90 but right sized on a 110. I run 255 which only with wheel spacers on filled out the wheel arch width size.
Another runs the 315 and those tires stick out way beyond the wheel arches.
That’s why I’m on board with 285/75-16.
My opinion disagrees. I have 255/85R16 on both my 90 and 110. I think they look perfect on both. The 110 could support 315’s imho. Just don’t want the weight/$/gearing. IMHO, the 255/85 or 285/75 are good sized. your turning radius is reduction too much for me on 285’s for my CO trails.
7C7D9506-8365-49CC-9C3A-EDE6D19056A0.jpeg
2D344846-2250-446E-AF39-A7DA5C8DCEB6.jpeg
[/QUOTE]
 

Uncle Douglas

Well-known member
Callsign: delete
Another vote for 285's in the first pic. The truck in the picture has more lift than any of the comparison pictures, looks to be @ least 3 inches. The tire wheel combo fits under the wheel arch/flare/spat in the picture. The picture of Bo's 110 @ Uwharrie with 305's is deceptive because he has the 30mm wider flares that recently came to market to cover the additional width.
Trey has 285 Geolanders's on the same ANR1534's on his 110 and has similar lift (764's in front and LR HD's in the rear). Tires bigger than 285 look really pinched on 1534's-ie dont work.
Hard to compare tire fitment/look on different wheels because of offset changes.
Lift plays a large role in appearance ie distance from top of tire to flare.
.
 
Last edited:
Top